Tweet Unto Others: Thoughts on being a good neighbor online

Jesus isn’t much for answering questions. All through the New Testament, Jesus ignores the question when he gives his answer. A friend once asked me if I thought this was rude. I admit that for a while I did. I felt guilty about this and chalked it up to his being God and that when you’re the boss you get to make the rules. But the longer I ask questions that don’t get answered, the more I see the problem isn’t Jesus’s answer. I think he’s trying to get us to ask better questions.

One of those answers was the parable of the good Samaritan. It wasn’t a random story Jesus told Peter at bedtime.  Jesus was asked, “Who is my neighbor?” after affirming that the second greatest commandment was “love your neighbor as yourself.”

I would have answered it with something smarmy about historical context and authorial intent. I would have wanted my answer to sound good on NPR, the kind of answer that would make Terry Gross thank me very much for talking with her.

Jesus responds with this story about a half-dead guy, a couple of people who refused to help him and a guy who did help him.

I would want to sound smart.

Jesus wants to change us.

In this story Jesus casts the widest possible net for treating someone else as we’d like to be treated ourselves. And he uses the most unlikely character to do so. I think the question Jesus is answering, and the one he wants us to ask, is “Who can I be a neighbor to?”

We all overlook someone we should be a neighbor to: Coworkers, customers, baristas, employees, family, grocery baggers, bosses, politicians, other drivers. Sometimes we over-spiritualize this teaching and forget that we should be neighbors to our neighbors. Everybody misses somebody.

How about your Twitter followers? Your Facebook friends? Your LinkedIn connections?

In the virtual world of social networking, it’s easy to get caught up in self. It’s your profile with your pictures and your words and your farmville (ugh). But social networks are about being connected. It’s the relational aspect of these sites that make them unique and popular.

If social networks are about relationships, then Jesus is calling us to be neighbors in these circles as well.

What does it look like to be a good neighbor on social networks? I have a few ideas, and I’ll share them here through at least the end of the year. I’m hoping that you have some ideas too because I’m sure I don’t have it all figured out.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Royals make strides toward another 90 loss season

The Kansas City Royals began preparations in earnest last week toward their goal of another 90 loss season in 2010. On November 6th, the team acquired youngsters 2B Chris Getz and 3B Josh Fields in a trade for Moneyballer 3B/OF Mark Teahen. Yesterday, the Royals sign six-year veteran 3B Wilson Betemit. These players are expected to play key roles for the Royals as they fight their way to the bottom of the Central Division standings.

Interestingly, all three players come from division rival Chicago White Sox who seem to be interested only in players who can help them win.

Team officials say they are hopeful that recent acquisitions will build on last year’s failures. With the contract of Jose Guillen coming to an end in 2010, experts are speculating that Fields will assume his role as the team’s oft-injured under-producing power hitter.

Betemit, who has been listed at SS by ESPN and both 1B and 3B by MLB.com in the last 24 hours, will give depth at a key position for the Royals: a weak hitting infielder with no real position. With a fielding percentage of .940 at the position he has the most experience (3B), it’s concerning that he could be a defensive upgrade over starting 3B Alex Gordon (.920). Thankfully, Betemit’s .940 would be next to last in the league in 2009 among qualified players at third.

Getz may be the one hiccup in the process. After a respectable rookie season some are concerned that he will continue to perform well. The Royals hope that Getz will get with the program and leave most of his potential unfulfilled. However, should Getz prove to be more than a .250 hitter with a bad glove, the club won’t be afraid to trade Getz for less promising talent.

And the team doesn’t seem ready to stop bringing in mediocre talent. In addition to trading Teahan, the Royals declined to exercise a $3,000,000 option on the team’s 2009 home run leader Miguel Olivo. The catcher’s power surge in last season clearly didn’t fit in with the direction of the team.

There are still a number of issues to address such as how to get low trade value for the teams remaining quality players, Zack Greinke, Billy Butler, and Joakim Soria. But as past trades for Jermaine Dye, Carlos Beltran, and Johnny Damon have shown, the Royals have the ability to get the job done.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Who are you welcoming? A question of demographics

Look, fun for the whole family! Dan Pink (A Whole New Mind) blogged this morning about a new report on American household demographics.

The report states that in 2010, the highest household demographic will be married couple with no children followed by single person households. Married with children will only account for 22% of all households. This isn’t off much from 2008 estimates found at the Census Bureau’s website, but it is worth thinking about.

Just 22%. Married with kids.

Fewer than 1 in 4.

Got it?

Ok. So here’s my question:

Is this how your church looks?

I know it’s not how mine looks. It’s easily half married with children households. This isn’t shocking. American churches have traditionally been a place centered around couples with kids. If you take into consideration that the kids of single parent families (about 8%) still get into children and youth programs, but that the parent works and doesn’t fit the couple paradigm, let’s estimate that number around 25%. This isn’t an age thing. Empty-nesters fit into the 75% as well.

How much of your programming is geared for the 75%? How much is geared for the 25%? Not just programming that isn’t exclusionary, but actually designed with either the 75% or the 25% in mind.

We’ve made church a fairly inviting place: a safe place to take our kids, sing for a while, drink some coffee, talk with some other people about our kids, etc. Though not everyone would agree, I think this is an environment that facilitates spiritual growth.

For the 25%.

And that’s great for them. I don’t want to take it away from them. And I don’t want them to leave. But I’m left wondering: will we reach out to everyone else?

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t want to market the Church (to the 75 or the 25). This isn’t about where we advertise or where we meet. We shouldn’t go hire a Coldplay cover band and have all our pastors dress at the GAP or the thrift store. The best ‘marketing’ a church can do is invite people into a welcoming, caring community who have been transformed by the radical, counter-cultural living out of the gospel of Jesus.

But after you’ve invited everyone, is everyone welcome?

Welcome your mission field.

Not welcome to your mission field.

Welcome them. Make your church a place they feel at home.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

One more idea about what’s wrong with the Royals

Jokaim Soria should stay in KC Sam Mellinger, who I think really gets it, wrote a blog last week about why the Royals should trade Joakim Soria. The logic is solid. It totally makes sense. With one caveat: the Royals front office can’t get fair value. This organization has shown themselves to be incompetent at getting value when trading anyone, let alone a star player. Minnesota could get four future Yankees for Soria. The Royals would be lucky to grab a couple .270 hitters who can put up 15 home runs and a middle reliever who replaces Ramirez or Nunez from last year’s trades.

More likely they get a couple .240 hitters who put up 10 dingers while being injured for 1/2 of the season, and a closer who blows a couple fewer leads than Kyle Farnsworth would.

Kansas City has had tons of prospects. The ones that turn out we trade for more prospects. The ones that don’t perform (or get injured and “we’d like to see what they can do in a full season”) we keep. From 1996 to 2008, there has been at least one former Royal on the WS winner’s post season roster. Tom Gordon, Kyle Snyder, Jeff Suppan, Jermaine Dye, Johnny Damon, Jeff Conine, Jay Bell, David Cone (x3) and Chili Davis, Jeff Conine and Jim Eisenreich, and David Cone (again). The exception was 2002 (Tom Goodwin was on the Giants losing roster). 2009 is guarenteed to continue the trend, with former Royals on both the Yankees and the Phillies. The best former Royal not on that list is number 9 on the top 10 home runs as a Royal list. He did it in just five and a half seasons in blue. If he were still a Royal, he’d be pushing Brett for the top spot next season or the season after.

During that same time, the Royals have a winning percentage of .422.

If you go back to 1991, the year George Brett became a DH and the Royals started rebuilding, their winning percentage is .440. They’ve had just four winning seasons. How do you explain it? None of the players are still here. None of the coaches are still around. Even the owner is different. Good players come to Kansas City and either get hurt or vastly under-perform. Players with great promise fell apart (Bob Hamlin and Angel Berroa to name a couple Rookie of the Year winners). Only the Expos/Nationals have gone longer without a playoff appearance.

What gives?

Anglican Bishop N.T. Wright offers one possible explanation in “Evil and the Justice of God”: “There is a great deal to be said for the view that all corporate institutions have a kind of corporate soul, an identity which is greater than the sum of its parts, which can actually tell the parts what to do and how to do it. This leads to the view that in some cases at least, some of these corporate institutions can become so corrupted with evil that the language of ‘possession’ at a corporate level becomes the only way to explain the phenomena before us.” (Intervaristy Press, pg. 38-39)

I don’t think the Royals have a demon. But maybe Wright is on to something. It seems that no matter how the parts change, the same result occurs. It’s as if there is something overarching that moves this team toward mediocrity. The culture of under-performance, while not demonic, reaches back to the earliest part of the post-Brett era and seems to be embedded as deep as a soul would be. I still think a salary cap would help. But every other team in baseball save the Expos have had some measure of success greater than Kansas City. I’m not sure that I have much of an explanation left.

Anybody know a good priest?

Blogged with the Flock Browser

The best things in life are green or Larry Johnson needs to spend an afternoon with Wendell Berry

Larry Johnson’s made his share of headlines this week. His agent, Peter Shaffer, has been in every one, not apologizing, but explaining away his client’s behavior. Yesterday, Shaffer told The Star on Monday that he advises Johnson and his other clients to be careful on Twitter. Kent Babb wrote: Schaffer said he preferred that his clients avoid social-networking sites, but the agent said he doesn’t force players to stop expressing themselves online.

But here’s the telling statement from Shaffer:

“They’re not making money on it. I don’t see (any benefit).”

Larry Johnson is surrounded by people telling him life is about getting paid. He is not a person, he is a corporation. Time is money, life is about money, so keep your head on straight so that you can get paid.

Humans are greedy, but LJ already knows money won’t buy him happiness. He’s got all the wealth a guy could want. But he’s not happy. Maybe winning would make him happy, but it was the offseason after going to the playoffs that caused Johnson the most trouble.

Larry Johnson could use some perspective. Don Miller would say he needs a better story. Wendell Berry would probably advise him to do something even more radical than the poem below, but I can’t help but think it’s the kind of life that LJ needs.

MANIFESTO: THE MAD FARMER LIBERATION FRONT
by Wendell Berry

Love the quick profit, the annual raise,
vacation with pay. Want more
of everything ready-made. Be afraid
to know your neighbors and to die.
And you will have a window in your head.
Not even your future will be a mystery
any more. Your mind will be punched in a card
and shut away in a little drawer.
When they want you to buy something
they will call you. When they want you
to die for profit they will let you know.

So, friends, every day do something
that won’t compute. Love the Lord.
Love the world. Work for nothing.
Take all that you have and be poor.
Love someone who does not deserve it.
Denounce the government and embrace
the flag. Hope to live in that free
republic for which it stands.
Give your approval to all you cannot
understand. Praise ignorance, for what man
has not encountered he has not destroyed.
 
Ask the questions that have no answers.
Invest in the millenium. Plant sequoias.
Say that your main crop is the forest
that you did not plant,
that you will not live to harvest.
Say that the leaves are harvested
when they have rotted into the mold.
Call that profit. Prophesy such returns.

Put your faith in the two inches of humus
that will build under the trees
every thousand years.
Listen to carrion – put your ear
close, and hear the faint chattering
of the songs that are to come.
Expect the end of the world. Laugh.
Laughter is immeasurable. Be joyful
though you have considered all the facts.
So long as women do not go cheap
for power, please women more than men.
Ask yourself: Will this satisfy
a woman satisfied to bear a child?
Will this disturb the sleep
of a woman near to giving birth?
 
Go with your love to the fields.
Lie down in the shade. Rest your head
in her lap. Swear allegiance
to what is nighest your thoughts.
As soon as the generals and the politicos
can predict the motions of your mind,
lose it. Leave it as a sign
to mark the false trail, the way
you didn’t go. Be like the fox
who makes more tracks than necessary,
some in the wrong direction.
Practice resurrection.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

My Dog: LOLed

lolbella

Mike Greenberg isn't That Guy

This morning on ESPN Radio’s Mike and Mike, Mike Greenberg unloaded on Redskins rookie linebacker Robert Henson this morning. Watch it here.

Greeny nailed the take. Players need to remember who they are playing for. But more impressive than the vein popping out of Greeny’s neck was the way he conducted himself after the rant.

He was embaressed.

He tried to downplay it.

Even though everyone was lauding him for ‘manning up’, he wanted to move on.

Why? With everyone cheering, why not run with it? I can’t say for sure, but here’s my hunch:

Mike Greenberg doesn’t want to be That Guy.

That Guy comes to the mic each day with a stack of things to yell about. He sits in front of the camera, looks you in the eye, and tells you who to blame. He sits atop the highest horse in the land throwing the rest of us morsels of anger to feed on until tomorrow when we all tune in again.

That Guy goes into each day looking for a fight.

Mike Greenberg isn’t That Guy.

Talk radio is full of That Guy. Talk radio, be it sports or politics or religion, is defined by the rant. “This is what’s wrong with your team, or your world, or your worldview, or just plain you.” It defines our debates on issues.

Greeny’s rant worked because it wasn’t cooked up. It was authentic. He didn’t go into the production meeting and ask, “What can I explode about today?” It was something he was personally passionate about and it interfered with his professionalism. In small doses, it’s exactly what the world needs.

Give me less of That Guy and more of Mike Greenberg.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

The real story in the Obama/Kanye flap

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/original/Moran_7.21.jpgThe internet is abuzz right now with two things: People tweeting “Nobody puts baby in a corner” and talk of President Obama’s off-the-record comments about Kanye West. I’ve never seen Dirty Dancing, but I have seen journalists miss the real story. And that’s what happening with Obama and Kanye.

The truth is, neither the POTUS or the T.O. of hip-hop are the story here. No one, on either side of the isle, should be all that shocked by what the President said. Whether you love him or hate him (and I feel lonely in the vast plain of space inbetween), this sort of off-the-record comment is not out of character. President Obama, like those who came before him, knows when the camera is rolling and behaves accordingly. Less popular behavior, like smoking, comes when the cameras are off.

The story isn’t what he said. It’s that it was reported at all.

Twitter is the real story.

What kept me out of twitter for a long time was the fear of having a stream of conscious medium. My first reaction is rarely my best one. I need to filter and process thoughts before telling the whole world.

The more you use twitter professionally, the more you must approach your tweets with care. And the more professionals use twitter, the more mistakes we’ll see. It takes time to get used to a new media outlet.

Make no mistake, Twitter is a new media outlet.

I’m sure Terry Moran is wishing he could take a mulligan. He broke journalistic ethics standards and (to the best of my knowledge) didn’t mean to. That’s serious and there may be some repercussions. Maybe he gets snubbed by politicians. Maybe he’ll have a beer at the White House to talk it through while the world criticizes his choice in libation. Maybe he’ll raise $1,000,000 for a political campaign because people are so eager to show their displeasure for the President that they will support poor behavior.

Or maybe another celebrity will die and we’ll all move on.

But don’t miss the real story. Twitter is a mighty tool. Use it carefully.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Things marketing people say

Anything's Possible With Popcorn

“Hey man, how’s it going? What did you do today?”

“Saved twelve puppies from a burning building.”

“Really? No way. That’s amazing. How’d you pull that off?”

“Easy, bro. I had popcorn.”

“Niiiiiice.”

“How about you?”

“Found Osama Bin Laden.”

“Bro, that’s unbelievable. I mean, people have been looking for him everywhere and haven’t found him. How’d you do it?”

“Easy, man. Anything’s possible with popcorn.”

Fantasy Tip of the Day: Heath Miller up on blocks

http://akjeff.smugmug.com/photos/448156282_nhLXQ-L.jpg The first season I played Fantasy Football, I had backups for everyone. Tight End, Defense, Kicker, you name it. I think I had a back up owner so that I could have a bye week. What can I say? I was 13. I can’t defend most of my actions as a 13 year old.

Keeping two tight ends on your roster is like keeping two old beat up trucks. One of them has a really good purpose. The other is just taking up space. Use the bench spot for depth at WR or RB. You need the depth there. Depth at TE is pointless.

Don’t sweat the bye-week. Even if you draft the first and fifth best tight ends, whoever you would pick up for the bye week will fill in for number one almost as well as number five. In 2008, there was a 2.5 point per week difference between the fifth best TE and the twentieth best TE.

Which is to say, after the top tier guys a TE is a TE is a TE.

According to the average draft position, while other guys are taking Chris Cooley in round 8, you could get Jamal Lewis or Julius Jones or Torry Holt or Devin Hester. All of those guys are first on their depth chart and will produce significant points this year. You could wait three more rounds and get Zach Miller, Dustin Keller or Visanthe Shiancoe. And when the bye-week comes around, grab Brandon Pettigrew or Bo Scaife or Vernon Davis to fill in.

If you insist on carrying two TEs, be sure to bring your trapper keeper and English textbook to the draft. Mr. Shaw hates it when you forget your books.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags: , , , ,